The Practical Guide to Humanitarian Law

« Calling things by the wrong name adds to the affliction of the world. » Albert Camus.

Cookies disclaimer

I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing our website without changing the browser settings you grant us permission to store that information on your device.


The term belligerent was used until the end of World War II to refer to:

  • the States taking part in a war or
  • the individuals authorized to use armed force.

This term no longer has a precise legal definition. Instead, the term party to the conflict is used since 1977 to define both State and non-state actors participating in an armed conflict.

However, the term belligerent continued to be used until 1977 to refer to individual insurgents who, in a civil war, actually controlled part of the territory of a State. So as to ensure a more cohesive system of protection and to simplify the distinction between the civilian population and those fighting in an armed conflict, the term combatant is now used in humanitarian law (API Arts. 43, 44, 48). The word belligerent is still used in everyday language.

CombatantGeneva ConventionsHigh Contracting Parties;International armed conflictInternational humanitarian lawLegal status of the parties to the conflictNon-international armed conflictNon-state armed groupsParties to the conflictPrivate military companiesWar

For Additional Information: Dinstein, Yoram. The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, and Louise Doswald-Beck, eds. Customary International Law . Vol. 1, The Rules . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, esp. parts 2 and 5.

Article also referenced in the 2 following categories :